[RSArchive Icon] Rudolf Steiner e.Lib Home  Version 2.5.4
 [ [Table of Contents] | Search ]


[Spacing]
Searching The Gospel of St. Mark
Matches

You may select a new search term and repeat your search. Searches are not case sensitive, and you can use regular expressions in your queries.


Enter your search term:
by: title, keyword, or contextually
   


Query was: think

Here are the matching lines in their respective documents. Select one of the highlighted words in the matching lines below to jump to that point in the document.

  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Some Preliminary Remarks
    Matching lines:
    • think that the polemical passages should be deleted. This is
    • reality, even things contrary to rational thinking may play
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Contents and Synopsis
    Matching lines:
    • transition from clairvoyance to nonclairvoyant thinking and
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 1
    Matching lines:
    • of all human thinking and feeling took place — not
    • men, through an inner urge, were compelled to think
    • reincarnation was not the center of thinking) to the figure
    • others think he must have been a beggar wandering through the
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 2
    Matching lines:
    • unreasonable to look at the human soul in this way? I think
    • evident that Steiner was thinking of the general
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 3
    Matching lines:
    • has often been described even by the materialistic thinkers
    • Because they think in this way, men do not correctly realize
    • that death on the Cross. There is no point in thinking that
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 4
    Matching lines:
    • thinking and human philosophy from the human to the
    • thinking, feeling, and perception the great figure of the
    • from the sorrow of life. In the midst of all their thinking
    • We can think
    • same time a higher unity. If we think of the Buddha face to
    • knowledge. Both science and popular thinking which today make
    • their thinking. Actually it is difficult for a man of today
    • to imagine this because today one thinks about everything.
    • But ancient man did not think in this way. He passed by
    • anthroposophists how they ought not to think. Sometimes we
    • are confronted with blatant examples of how not to think,
    • although many people believe we should indeed think like
    • example of an odd kind of thinking which I am quoting here
    • beginning now to study them! This is a way of thinking that
    • accepted that such things must be unthinkable, absolutely
    • unthinkable in our anthroposophical movement. For it is a
    • unable to think in this way. We can make no step
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 5
    Matching lines:
    • possess the words, and with them think they have everything.
    • these most mature thinkers of Christianity, we meet with in a
    • essence, the answer is: Krishna! But we must not think of
    • this being as identical with any single plant but must think
    • believe they are able to think with great subtlety. But when
    • all respect for the thinking of today, especially for its
    • logical thinking. At this point I really must engage
    • People think
    • elevation which it did not achieve through thinking but
    • came down to us. When there are thinkers like Fichte,
    • in their thinking, then we can meet with these things again,
    • of touch; it could think with the intellect about things, the
    • he said, “Change your way of thinking. Do not continue
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 6
    Matching lines:
    • different when we think of individual human lives. As you all
    • When we think
    • may think of as a predisposition in favor of events that
    • reversion to a kind of thinking that had already been
    • outgrown by mankind, for the way of thinking suited to
    • may think of as the general, recurring, identical
    • think it would be better if we looked for successive
    • thinking, to a concept of history, as the only conception in
    • we may think of as being possible through his physical
    • hear, and you do not think of what I did. I broke the five
    • of course think of black magic, though if a plentiful
    • this way. “Get behind me, Satan! You are thinking
    • are thinking only of what is convenient for men, not for
    • came from. To this the disciples reply, “People think
    • Let us think
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 7
    Matching lines:
    • achieved through human thinking, nor is it thought out like
    • through the power of logical thinking and logical judgment
    • remarkable thinker emerged in Syros. Certainly he describes
    • things differently from other thinkers, who were later to be
    • something of what these first lonely Greek thinkers
    • think of a soul which is rooted in the West, prepared for the
    • able to see into the elemental world. Now let us think of one
    • Let us think
    • yearning they could not understand it. In Indian thinking
    • in the lonely Greek thinkers. Therefore Indian philosophy
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 8
    Matching lines:
    • these people are thinking like a certain other person. For it
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 9
    Matching lines:
    • Think of the loneliness of this man, permeated as He was by
  • Title: Gospel of Mark: Lecture 10
    Matching lines:
    • the centuries for them to think it necessary to ask whether
    • something that someone else thinks is “quite
    • right to accept from the materialistic thinking of our time
    • grounds for saying that a man can think with one part of his
    • brain or cannot think if this part of the brain is missing,
    • physical corporeality is much better adapted to think himself
    • feelings that arise in us when we think of the great
    • being of the Mystery of Golgotha. We may also think of this



The Rudolf Steiner e.Lib is maintained by:
The e.Librarian: elibrarian@elib.com