`
[RSArchive Icon] Rudolf Steiner e.Lib Home  Version 2.5.4
 [ [Table of Contents] | Search ]


[Spacing]
Searching The Philosophy of Thomas Aquinas
Matches

You may select a new search term and repeat your search. Searches are not case sensitive, and you can use regular expressions in your queries.


Enter your search term:
by: title, keyword, or context
   


   Query type: 
    Query was: call
  

Here are the matching lines in their respective documents. Select one of the highlighted words in the matching lines below to jump to that point in the document.

  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Preface to Part Two
    Matching lines:
    • spiritually and historically powerful argument of these
    • historically powerful motif — from Thomas Aquinas to
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Lecture I: Thomas and Augustine
    Matching lines:
    • accustomed to call “Monism” reached its height,
    • history of philosophy is generally called Neoplatonism.
    • Manichaeism had extraordinarily little effect historically on
    • to say of Manichaeism — much more emphatically true than
    • which we would to-day call material, unfolding itself to our
    • might call its mystical content as I have just described it to
    • sympathetically moved by the physical self-evidence, by the
    • call the revival of spiritual life. In other places I have
    • called material-spiritual to something purely spiritual,
    • that part of it which must be called its most significant part,
    • what we know as spiritual life. Whatever we may call it, a mere
    • we call a life of the soul free from matter; he does not
    • historically what neither the Dialogues of Plato and still less
    • is for Plotinus what Plato calls the “world of
    • the One, if you like to call it so — the experience of
    • it from the old. What I there call the Imagination is just that
    • practically contained in it. And one can be an individualist in
    • lived in his age as a predecessor — for if I might call
    • one may hypothetically say that — all humanity appears as
    • Augustine stands, with what I might call his derived knowledge,
    • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Lecture II: The Essence of Thomism
    Matching lines:
    • in the thirteenth, had wished only to harmonize dialectically
    • philosophically that in these thinkers we get the highest
    • so logically scientific, either before or afterwards as in the
    • This and other things called forth in this epoch that
    • whole to divinity, all this never leads to what one can call
    • people of to-day who are accustomed to what is called polemics
    • to call it if one were to speak in Plotinus' sense. It is
    • spiritual-psychically, to work on the organism. Then inside
    • an active part, which practically builds up the body,
    • calls the nous, and the Scholiasts call the intellect.
    • the impressions of the outer world dialectically, is the
    • existed; for what we to-day call understanding, what we call
    • called the universals. Yes, as the situation for mankind was
    • which he calls angels. These are not just abstractions, they
    • yesterday as being inherent in Plotinism, and called the
    • ourselves in things, and get out of them what we can call the
    • theologically and false philosophically. One could say straight
    • something of that creed which I yesterday called the Manichaean
    • what I called the general logical nature of Albertinism and
    • reason — what was then called the Intellect — we
    • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Lecture III: Thomism in the Present Day
    Matching lines:
    • called the “nous poieticos” enters into man.
    • has to set something simple against something historically
    • Intellectualism so energetically.
    • to be touched by what is called knowledge and learning. On the
    • pedantically, only, we may say, to give the whole a certain
    • Kant the question of what is the relation of what we call
    • it sounds — though it is paradoxical only historically in
    • extinguished all knowledge, sprouted the so-called Postulates
    • himself by changing ordinary thinking into what I called
    • philosophical basic principles of what we call here Spiritual
    • of knowledge; rather it must be clear that what we call in
    • we must call in the highest sense the deepening of our
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Comment I: Thomas and Platonism
    Matching lines:
    • particular physically visible man is not the same as
    • “man”; but that he is called “man”
    • Therefore, the separate man was called “man per
    • Goodness and of Oneness and of Existence, and which we call
    • God; and imagined that all other beings are called
    • Intrinsically-Good or the First-Good, or the Super-Good, and
    • Dionysius calls God at different times the Self-Good, the
    • similarly he calls Him the Super-Life, the Super-Substance, and
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Comment II: Man and the Intelligible World
    Matching lines:
    • immaterial intellectual beings, which he calls the Angels [p.
    • bring divine messages to man, are therefore called Angeli, that
    • therefore, they are called “Seraphim,” from the
    • called “Cherubim,” after the fullness of knowledge.
    • effects, wherefore they are called “Thrones,” from
    • arts are those that are thus pre-arranged, and these are called
    • therefore the second Order of this Hierarchy is called
    • called “Angels,” because they bring to man as a
    • also called the guardian-angels of men. Above them is the Order
    • faith. The highest Order of this Hierarchy is called, according
    • Rudolf Steiner calls “the highest flowering of logical
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Comment IV: Man as a Learning Being
    Matching lines:
    • light given to man, is called “The gift of the
    • to see something physically, so it is not necessary, in order
    • God is not called incomprehensible because He has some quality
    • be added to it. For this reason, we call the increase of the
    • called the “intellectus possibilis,” or potential
    • that the human intellect, which we called
    • actually visible. And we call this the “Intellectus
    • matter. Things composed of matter and form are intrinsically
    • images he would be incapable (N.B. — by calling them up
    • this is called “teaching.” And in this sense one
  • Title: Thomas Aquinas: Comment V: The Application of Intelligence to the Human Body
    Matching lines:
    • if one may call it so — of Thomas is a fortress built of
    • man. The so-called “Creationism” — the
    • a clod of earth, for earth mixed with water is called a clod.
    • Therefore, also, man is called a “small world”
    • So that Aristotle calls the hand “the organ of
    • change their position not only relatively but basically. Thus
    • that he speaks and acts frankly. But concupiscence one calls



The Rudolf Steiner e.Lib is maintained by:
The e.Librarian: elibrarian@elib.com